ARIN-prop-132: ISP Sub-assignments…

February 11th, 2011

Yesterday evening I submitted a policy proposal to ARIN, with the effect of enabling address holders to “lease” IP addresses. Traditionally, an ISP might have provided addresses (for a fee or for free) as part of a network connectivity service. There is currently no policy that mandates that relationship, however, and this policy proposal is an attempt to clarify that no specific relationship is required.

ARIN-prop-132: ISP Sub-assignments Do Not Require Specific Customer Relationships

Proposal Originator: Benson Schliesser

Proposal Version: 1

Date: 11 February 2011

Proposal type: modify

Policy term: permanent

Policy statement:

Section 4.2.1.1 of the NRPM shall be modified to read:

“ARIN allocates blocks of IP addresses to ISPs for the purpose of
reassigning that space to their customers. ARIN does not limit
reassignment by ISPs to their customers based on any criteria except
those that are explicitly described in the NRPM. An ISP is solely
responsible for determining whether an organization is a customer for
the purposes of reassignment under this policy.”

Rationale:

This policy proposal is intended to permit an ISP to enter into
reassignment relationships with anybody they deem to be a customer.
Under this proposal, ARIN will not object to reassignment relationships
because of their business nature. This specifically permits the
reassignment of IPv4 addresses in “lease” relationships between an ISP
and its customers, amongst others.

Timetable for implementation: immediately

NANOG now owned by NewNOG

February 7th, 2011

After a very long time supporting the NANOG community, MERIT has transitioned ownership of the NANOG property to a newly incorporated group called NewNOG.  My understanding is that NewNOG has initially been funded by a loan from ARIN (which announced the transition today), and has created a new membership structure that should help with ongoing funding.

NANOG participants aren’t required to become NewNOG members. However, participation in the governance of NANOG (via NewNOG) will require membership, including payment of the $100 membership dues. Even if you don’t intend to pursue leadership positions within NANOG, membership will help with ongoing NANOG business following this transition – so, please consider joining NewNOG if you can.

And, of course, many thanks to MERIT for their service to the NANOG community.

Final Five IPv4 Blocks Allocated

February 3rd, 2011

As anticipated, the final five /8 blocks of IPv4 addresses were allocated from IANA to the RIRs this morning. They were apparently granted in alphabetical order.

http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xml

102/8    AfriNIC    2011-02    whois.afrinic.net    ALLOCATED
103/8    APNIC      2011-02    whois.apnic.net      ALLOCATED
104/8    ARIN       2011-02    whois.arin.net       ALLOCATED
179/8    LACNIC     2011-02    whois.lacnic.net     ALLOCATED
185/8    RIPE NCC   2011-02    whois.ripe.net       ALLOCATED

Facts are getting the best of them

February 2nd, 2011


Wasting away and that was their policy
I’m ready to leave, I push the fact in front of me
Facts lost, facts are never what they seem to be
Nothing there, no information left of any kind
I’m lifting my head, looking for danger signs
There was a line, there was a formula
Sharp as a knife, facts cut a hole in us

Facts are simple and facts are straight
Facts are lazy and facts are late
Facts all come with points of view
Facts don’t do what I want them to
Facts just twist the truth around
Facts are living turned inside out
Facts are getting the best of them

Talking Heads – Crosseyed & Painless

http://www.lyricsfreak.com/t/talking+heads/crosseyed+painless_20135079.html

Predicted RIR IPv4 Exhaustion

February 1st, 2011

Geoff Huston was kind enough to produce a graph of the month-by-month probability of when each RIR will run out of their “normal” IPv4 address pool. As he described in a post to NANOG, this graph assumes that no unusual inter-region activities cause the utilization rate to change. So, things could go differently in reality. But this is a pretty good starting perspective on when member organizations will start being denied new IPv4 address allocations.