Archive for the ‘Technology’ Category

Cyan Optics and Economic Reality

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

Om Malik has a post on GigaOm entitled The Return of the Optical Startup — Cyan Optics Launches discussing a new start-up in the optical space, Cyan Optics. As I read his post I had a thought, which I was happy to see he captured near the end of the article:

Many of these products have been talked about for years. In an ideal world, Cisco would have developed some of these technologies as next-generation Cerent products. When I talked to Hatfield last week, he pointed out that the carriers want to deliver more bandwidth and yet keep the costs of delivering that bandwidth low, otherwise the network economics breakdown. Cyan was started to address this quandary, he said.

I haven’t met with Cyan yet, though I may have exchanged emails with them sometime over the past year… My memory is so overloaded with cloud networking these days that I can’t recall. ;)

In any case, I’m glad to hear about their strategy for an optical multi-service platform. This is something that I’ve hoped for and expected for some time. I’m surprised that Cisco hasn’t built this already, given their integration of optical capabilities in router platforms like the CRS. With the right optical multi-service platform, technologies like GMPLS and GFP could enable more dynamic networking in the transport layer for both access and backbone. This is a vision that Cisco seems to have in their mind, and yet to me they seem blind to the need for multi-service L1 and L2 network elements.

Cyan’s management platform also looks impressive. This isn’t an area in which Cisco has been impressive, either. But take a look at Cyan’s multi-layer visualization from their website:

Cyan Multi-Layer Visualization

Maybe Cyan can help wake Cisco up to the reality of building physical networks. Perhaps they will be an interesting acquisition target for Cisco, if not a competitor. I’ve thought the same thing about previous start-up platforms (like the impressive Hammerhead Systems L2.5 MSE platform) and I turned out to be wrong then. But perhaps the recovering economy will cast a new light on the situation. After all, we’re seeing that there is demand for bandwidth even in a broad economic down-turn. But there is money to be made only if platform vendors enable service providers to build economical networks, recognizing that profit margins are already razor-thin for most.

Cloud is a System of Control

Monday, June 1st, 2009

Of course I’m biased… Bryan Doerr is my boss1 and a man that I greatly respect personally. But even considering my bias, I have to say that this is a great quote from his recent article at GigaOm, Cloud Computing: A System of Control:

…cloud computing isn’t cheap computing; it is the delivery of more control to enterprises so they can deliver IT services more affordably and efficiently.

This is the “dirty” truth: infrastructure costs money, and service providers don’t have any magic dust to make that fact obsolete. What providers do have is increased “buying power” and synergy due to large-scale multi-tenant operations. As well, an enterprise-class cloud provider has a focus on IT and the tools needed to operate as best-of-breed.

These are issues that businesses have historically invested in, just to build a platform to support their critical apps. But with the majority of apps running on common and well-established platforms this is “undifferentiated heavy lifting”2. By investing in enterprise-class cloud services instead of in-house platforms many enterprise IT shops can become more nimble, more focused on the issues and apps that drive their business, and ultimately lead their company to further competitive advantage.

1 – Nota Bene: This post is my own, is not sponsored, and has not been reviewed by anybody. My opinions, postings, and all other materials are my own and do not necessarily represent those of my employer (Savvis, Inc.) or of any other entity.

2 – Attributed to Werner Vogels (http://www.allthingsdistributed.com/), also see http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1466443.1466447 and http://blip.tv/file/471349

The Presidential Debate, Twitter, and Plodt

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

During this evening’s Presidential debate in Nashville, I sat in front of my television twittering away. For me these debates are like sporting events. I get excited and cheer their answers, or make fun of them. It’s a good time. But tonight was even better because of the suggestion by Andy Carvin of NPR that we “dialtest” the debate using Twitter, and the support of a new website called Plodt which draws graphs based on Twitter messages. The result of this experiment was this graph:

This was a lot of fun, and I will definitely participate in the next stage of this experiment.

Suspicion Not Required to Search Laptops at Border

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008

In addition to traditional physical searches of your person and belongings, the US Customs and Border Patrol claims the right to search and seize any data that you are traveling with. The contents of your electronic devices (phone, laptop, etc) are all subject to review, seizure, and/or copying by the US government as you cross the border. Being a US citizen does not grant you any additional rights or protection. And apparently the government is not subject to laws prohibiting theft of confidential data, violation of copyright or DRM mechanisms, or unauthorized access to computing resources when the data is crossing the border. Which shouldn’t surprise me, I guess.

Their latest article suggests that “it’s important to note that for more than 200 years, the federal government has been granted the authority to prevent dangerous people and things from entering the United States.” I’m not sure that information qualifies as either a dangerous person or a dangerous thing, and I don’t think it should. This policy defies the reasonable expectations of US citizens and is contrary to the fundamental principles of a free society.

Yes, I realize the issue is more complicated, that it’s not black-or-white. That’s my point. The US government should respect that today’s electronic environment, tools, and uses do not clearly fit into the scope of their traditional mission. They should not default to fascist behavior but should instead default to respectful behavior toward the people they’re in place to serve. Expanded powers in response a changing environment should be achieved through public discourse and legislation.

Whether or not you agree with my view of the details, please take a look at the following campaigns:

Labs at Night Photo-essay by Seed Magazine

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

Via David Strom’s blog, I found this photo essay of labs at night. One of my favorite moments is walking into a dark lab, or closing up at the end of a long night… When I switch off the room’s lights and turn-around to close and lock the door, the shining LEDs of every color, flashing as packets flow, sometimes temporarily blinding me (Juniper’s blue LEDs on M-series anyone?), are always beautiful enough to surprise me and make me feel like there is still some mystery and magic in the technology I work with.