RE: [lisp-interest] While we're waiting for lisp@ietf.org to come up.....

["PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri" <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be>]

dino: 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:dino@cisco.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:38 AM
> To: PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
> Cc: Darrel Lewis (darlewis); David Meyer; 
> lisp-interest@lists.civil-tongue.net
> Subject: Re: [lisp-interest] While we're waiting for 
> lisp@ietf.org to come up.....
> 
> > as that section states:
> >
> > "This section will describe the multicast corollary to 
> [INTWORK] which
> >   describes the interworking of multicast routing among 
> LISP and non-
> >   LISP sites."
> >
> > this document being still at early stage interworking aspects which
> > are usually informational should go into one place.
> 
> But what begs the question is, should multicast be distributed in  
> multiple documents.

this is not what i mean. interworking specs are usually in the
informational track.  

we can discuss it further at the mboned today.

thanks,
-d.
> Dino
> 
> >
> >
> > -d.
> >
> >
> >> Dino
> >>
> >>
> 
>