Re: [lisp-interest] While we're waiting for lisp@ietf.org to come up.....

[Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Jari Arkko wrote:
...
> What has happened since then is that I've offered various approaches to
> doing this, but the Lisp team has not wanted to do it, and would rather
> work in the IETF.
...
> I see two ways forward: (a) we have more community discussion on list or
> in a 2nd BOF to convince ourselves that the community wants to create a
> WG or (b) we go back to the advice that the Dublin meeting gave us.

I see two things happening:

	1- the IESG determines where this needs to happen

	2- the LISP team will keep asking the question until they
	get the answer they like

I appreciate that (2) is currently in vogue in the IETF as a whole, but
it's a suboptimal way to handle this sort of thing.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkkfjcACgkQE5f5cImnZruRpgCg8pVjIk6acd8M71Wp895ZYRaz
OBIAoN3OmxAb13g+7hIUcMwZ3jkcsbL9
=zlxE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----