RE: [lisp-interest] While we're waiting for lisp@ietf.org to come up.....

["PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri" <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be>]

dave: 

here belwo comments on the charter: 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-list-interest@lists.civil-tongue.net 
> [mailto:owner-list-interest@lists.civil-tongue.net] On Behalf 
> Of David Meyer
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:07 AM
> To: lisp-interest@lists.civil-tongue.net
> Subject: [lisp-interest] While we're waiting for 
> lisp@ietf.org to come up.....
> 
> 	Here's the proposed LISP WG charter. Comments greatly
> 	appreciated. 
> 
> 	Dave
> ---
> 
> 
> LISP (Locator/ID Separation Protocol)
> 
> Last Modified: 2008-11-18
> 
> Chair(s):
>  TBD
> 
> Internet Area Director(s):
>  Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
>  Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
> 
> Routing Area Advisor:
>  TBD
> 
> Secretary(ies):
>  TBD
>  
> Mailing Lists:
>  General Discussion: lisp@ietf.org
> 
> Description of Working Group:
> 
> LISP and companion documents (see below) are proposals that
> respond to the problems discussed at the IAB's October, 2006

wouldn't it be appropriate to state the purpose is to experiment whether
the proposals are appropriate answers to the questions of the IAB ?

> Routing and Addressing Workshop [0]. The purpose of the BOF is to
> form a working group whose charter (see below) is to work on the
> design on the LISP base protocol [1], the LISP+ALT mapping system

i would mention explicitly "protocol architecture and spec." 

> [2], LISP Interworking [4] and LISP multicast [6]. The working

text should make clear that interworking also applicable to mcast.  

> group will encourage and support interoperable LISP
> implementations as well as defining requirements for alternate
> mapping systems.

shouldn't it be the other way around: specify requirements and then
implementations ?

> Goals and Milestones:
> 
> Mar 2010  Submit base LISP specification to the IESG for
>           Experimental.
> 
> Mar 2010  Submit base ALT specification to the IESG for
>           Experimental.
> 
> Mar 2010  Submit the LISP Interworking specification to the IESG
> 	  for Experimental.
> 
> Mar 2010  Re-charter or close.

i would like to see a document also documenting experimental results
from various execution of the protocol spec.

thanks,
-d.

> Internet-Drafts:
> 	draft-farinacci-lisp-9.txt
> 	draft-farinacci-lisp-multicast-00.txt
> 	draft-fuller-lisp-alt-03.txt
> 	draft-lewis-lisp-interworking-01.txt
> 
> Request For Comments:
> 	  None
> 
> 
> References
> ----------
> [0]     Meyer, D. et. al., "Report from the IAB Workshop on
>         Routing and Addressing", RFC 4984.
> 
> [1]     Farinacci, D. et. al., "Locator/ID Separation Protocol
>         (LISP)", draft-farinacci-lisp-09.txt.
> 
> [2]	Fuller, V., et. al., "LISP Alternative Topology
> 	(LISP-ALT)", draft-fuller-lisp-alt-03.txt
> 
> [3]	Iannone, L., and O. Bonaventure, "OpenLISP Implementation
> 	Report", draft-iannone-openlisp-implementation-00.txt.
> 
> [4]	Lewis, D., et. al., "Interworking LISP with IPv4 and
> 	IPv6", draft-lewis-lisp-interworking-01.txt.
> 
> [5]	Mathy, L., et. al., "LISP-DHT: Towards a DHT to map
> 	identifiers onto locators", draft-mathy-lisp-dht-00.txt.
> 
> [6]     Farinacci, D., Meyer, D., Zwiebel, J., and S. Venaas,
> 	"LISP for Multicast Environments",
> 	draft-farinacci-lisp-multicast-00.txt.  
>